Well, Buckaroos, believe it or not, it is time once again
for the Ol' Bloviator's fearless and feckless quadrennial estimate of our
ever-sorrier state of electoral affairs. It's hard to recall, or even find in
the historical record, a presidential campaign where the choice put to the
sovereign voter has come down to so joyless a decision on which candidate is
less repulsive, however marginally, than the other. Let's face it, we can
readily check the "liar," "corrupt," "schemer" and several other boxes in the
nefarious for both, and if Donald Trump loses this race--it is hard to think of
any "winner" emerging from this God-awful mess-- it will be because he has
pulled off the Herculean achievement of being more repugnant than his opponent.
(In fact, he has supposedly racked up the most prodigious negativity ratings in
the storied history of Gallup tracking.)
Trump's opponent,
meanwhile, may garner a more than substantial electoral vote margin, but she
entered the campaign as largely self-damaged goods, and as over-the-top as
Trump's attacks and characterizations of her may have seemed, she will emerge,
almost unthinkably, with her credibility even more tattered. If she does put up
the anticipated big numbers nationally, she will do so while providing the
almost scandalously scanty coattails of someone who claimed the election by a proverbial
gnat's whisker. Yes, the O.B. knows as many four Democrats are poised to pick
up senate seats, but if they do, their thank-you notes should go not to the
person at the head of their ticket for lifting them up, but to the GOP standard
bearer for pulling his own people down. Constant rumors of unethical and
immoral conduct and innuendo are a family tradition for the Clintons, as are
their predictable counter-claims that they are being persecuted by shadowy right-wing
ideologues and other bitterly partisan conspirators. We may be assured that
even if the email flap that has dogged Hillary's campaign this year ultimately
dies down, her time in office, however long it may be, will be constantly
punctuated by rat-a-tats of disclosures and allegations of ethical misconduct,
tantamount to the serial "bimbo eruptions" that dogged her hyper-sexed hubby.
Perhaps we should wait to see what actually happens on
November 8, but where's the fun in that? From where things stand right now, it
seems a reasonable bet that a great many Americans will go to bed that night
relieved that Donald Trump is not going to be president but depressed that
Hillary Clinton is. Those curious about how the nuts and bolts of this seemingly
contradictory projection came together should look first to the vaunted "Blue
Wall" of eighteen states, plus D. C., accounting for 242 of the 270 electoral votes
needed to win that have voted Democratic in the last six elections. We were
assured several times this fall that the Blue Wall no longer exists, but you
certainly can't prove it by the current polls, which show Trump either out of
the running or trailing significantly in all of them. The Republicans have a "Red Wall" of their own, of course, but consisting
principally of the bulk of the Old Confederacy plus the fly-over states, it
boasts but 102 electoral votes. (See the adjoining chart showing the Blue Wall/Red
Wall division of the electoral vote pie.)
We all know the polls are "rigged," of course, but they are still the best thing we have to go on, and they currently show Trump with little prospect of chipping a single brick off the Blue Wall. If we look at how Trump is faring poll-wise compared to the actual showing of Mitt Romney in 2012, he is trailing in North Carolina, but seems to have at least a decent shot at besting Romney by claiming the "toss-up" states of Iowa, Ohio, and Florida. Accounting for 53 electoral votes among them, these states are no small prizes,but, according to the accompanying projection, courtesy of realclearpolitics.com, even if he pulls this off, he would still stand at only 234 electoral votes compared to Hillary's projected 304, leaving him well shy of the magical 270 total needed to make 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue go all Trumpazilla.
Beyond that, Trump is facing enough of a challenge in traditionally red-to-the-roots states like Georgia, Arizona, and, for God's sake, UTAH (!) that his campaign has had to devote precious time and resources simply to hold onto his once-presumed base--time that could have been spent in states he needs desperately to drag into the GOP column.
Curiously, although Trump seems to
be shut out of the White House by an impenetrable barrier of Democratic voting
consistency, he actually owes the continuing viability of his candidacy to a
corresponding pattern of Republican partisan rigidity. In fact, Sam Wang points
out that despite all the apparent ups and downs of his campaign, D.T.'s support has remained "level as a pond"
at roughly 41 percent. Citing the rapid rise in partisan polarization over the last generation, Mr.
Wang notes that from 1952 to 1992, the average swing or range, plus to minus,
in a presidential candidate's support over the course of a campaign was 17
percent, while, over the last six elections it has shrunk to only 8 percent. More
remarkably still, despite what seemed one politically disastrous incident after
another, including his thrashing at the hands of the family of Capt. Humayan
Khan, Donald Trump's support has varied by only 4 points, between 39 and 43
percent. The pundits have asserted more than once that Trump's backers
represent a sorely disaffected minority upset over immigration, outsourcing, political
correctness, and other conditions contributing to a sense of lost opportunity
and relevance. This may well be true of his most strident followers, but if you
are looking for somebody likely to vote for ol' Donnie, your best bet is still your
nearest Republican (Ditto and vice-versa for a Hillary voter, as well ) The
Republican ranks may also hold a number of "silent voters" too embarrassed to
tell a pollster that they actually plan to cast their lot with The Donald on
November 8, but while their boy may fare well enough in the popular tally to
sorely discomfit the Left, Middle, and even some on the Right, it appears at this juncture at least that these
resolutely mute voters will suddenly have to let loose with one hell of a
bellow to affect the actual outcome.
The O. B. has recently become less
interested in the campaign itself than in its aftermath. He has already noted
that Hillary is likely to emerge looking and feeling as though she has done
fifteen rounds with Boom Boom Mancini. (Eat your heart out, Warren Zevon.) Beyond
that, when Trump's irresponsible, vengeful nonsense about a rigged election and
his invocation of the "Second Amendment crowd" elicit comments to the effect
that if Ms. Clinton is allowed to take office, and "has to go by any means
necessary, it will be done," we are reminded that the demise of Trump the
Candidate will not mark the end of Trump the Menace or, more troubling still,
the powerfully frightening mindset he has so recklessly exploited.
