DANIEL V. MOHAMMED

I can certainly understand why many Americans are shaking their heads at the storm of controversy that erupted in the Muslim world when several European newspapers ran cartoons depicting the prophet Mohammed wearing a turban that doubles as a bomb. While the cartoons were deliberately and heavy handedly provocative, the fanatically violent response and the resulting loss of life stretches even my rather elastic respect for legitimate cultural and religious differences very nearly to the snapping point.
Before we go overboard in congratulating ourselves on our own vaunted reputation for religious tolerance, however, we might note the storm of self-righteous zealotry that cowed NBC into pulling its controversial series, “The Book of Daniel,” after just three episodes. So far as I know, this conflict did not result in bloodshed, although it did produce death threats against some station managers who aired the show over the strenuous protests of some local viewers.
Although some objected to “Daniel” because of its portrayal of a severely flawed Episcopal priest and his equally flawed family and flock, the show’s most egregious offense was its characterization of Jesus Christ as a decidedly laid-back but constant and caring presence in the everyday lives of even the sinful and whacked-out. Such sacrilege! The producers might as well have depicted the focal figure of the Christian faith as a terrorist.

Monthly Archives

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Jim Cobb published on February 9, 2006 8:42 AM.

BATTERIES NOT INCLUDED: PASSION PARTIES DOWN SOUTH was the previous entry in this blog.

OL' BOY GETS SOME 'ATTA' BOYS!: FROM IRA BERLIN'S REVIEW OF "AWAY DOWN SOUTH" IN THE WASHINGTON POST is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.